Patrick Vieira reacts to his comments being misinterpreted

by

Patrick Vieira has recently reacted to what he thinks is a misinterpretation of comments he made about Manchester United. The Frenchman, who plays for Manchester City, recently created a great deal of controversy with fans of Manchester United, when he said that their attempt to bring Paul Scholes out of retirement in order to play was the club desperately trying to improve its game.

He says that the quotes have been taken out of context when they were used during an interview. They were initially made in order to be part of a campaign Vieira does as part of his charity work. They were made for a video about supporting the fight against starvation in Africa.

A statement released by Manchester City has read, “He gave the interview to the BBC and people have been misinterpreting the statement. Mr Vieira also feels that during the interview which was done with Dan Roan, from the BBC, the questions from the reporter were very leading with regard to seeking comment from him about Manchester United.

They were especially leading in regard to Manchester United being given preferential treatment by referees at matches.” Mr Vieira maintains that is comments have been taken dramatically out of context.

Man Utd. make hard work of it against Fulham

by

In the recent big match at Old Trafford, the hosts huffed and puffed for the most part without fully exerting the influence over the ever defensive Fulham. United are now leading their rivals, Manchester city by three points in the title race. Rooney was at the right place in right time for firing the winner just three minutes before the break after cut-back at far post from Jonny Evans.

The goal has proved to be enough for three points but United were unable to further cut the 3 goal difference advantage of City despite having many chances in the second half. The cottagers has little to to offer in their 4-5-1 formation, and also had the knowledge that they had won only once at United’s ground since the year 1959.

They got a good chance early in the match but, the keeper David de Gea saved the Goal and denied Clint Dempsey. There was pressure at the other end but when Ashley Young floated over a cross, Rooney ducked underneath it.

Evans, with his presence of mind, nudged the ball back to the striker who beat Mark Schwarzer, finishing simply from close range. Schwarzer then made some smart moves saving attempts from both Rooney and Young and everyone was relieved when the final whistle blew.

Plan for the future from Scottish football Fans

by
Plan for the future from Scottish football Fans

Plan for the future from Scottish football Fans

Football supporters have a unique vision for league football in Scotland, and it includes larger attendance at games, better methods of funding, and increased competition.

The Scotland trust Supporters Direct Scotland aims to implement some of these changes by publishing their directive, The Fans’ Plan,’ that is filled with recommendations to help make league football more entertaining for fans in the country. The information contained inside is the result of two years of surveys conducted among fans and supporters.

The Fans’ Plan calls for:

greater competition within Scottish league football structures

equal funding for each team in a league

support for clubs by central league management to increase the average attendance by 20% by 2016, and achieve an average stadium capacity utilisation of 65% within 10 years

two leagues of 16 teams, and a qualifying league of 10 or a feeder league of 16

re-introducing the League Cup, with a mini-league qualifying format structured on a geographical basis with four teams in each group

improved training and professional development for all players including greater use of Modern Apprenticeships and post-career planning

the establishment and implementation of a strong club licensing scheme

SDS spokesperson, Alan Harris commented: “The future of Scottish league football lies in the hands of its supporters and Supporters Direct Scotland has gathered the views of fans for the past two years: the most comprehensive surveys of football supporters in recent times. Fans are clearly telling us, we want more competition, more even distribution of the available funds, investment in the game, especially developing its talent from grassroots, and a greater say for supporters in clubs and national football.”

Alan Harris added: “Our approach is fairly simple. It’s about creating a virtuous circle for the long-term benefit of Scottish football. Too much of the present has been driven by short-term fixes and quick wins. However, that approach is unravelling at every level of the game. The time is right to re-build the foundations of the game in Scotland. We are proposing that a combination of league re-structuring, a re-formatted League Cup and more even distribution of funds, can continue to attract the all-important television sponsorship, create more competition between clubs and widen the game’s attraction to bring supporters back. This is our path to more sustainable development of Scottish league football.”

 

Rangers owner fighting to keep club afloat

by

Craig Whyte is the owner of Rangers football club and he came into power after muscling his way to the top through an investment from a company called Ticketus. He managed to secure funding to purchase the club through a promise of the sale of 100,000 season tickets in the future.

His method of funding the purchase was kept a secret and many people thought that he had funded it with his own money, but once the story was broken by Record Sport he became a disgrace in the eyes of the fans.

Now the football club is in a financial crisis and it seems that they could be about to enter administration. Paul Murray has been working hard at finding a way to save the club and improve its financial situation but it has recently emerged that he has been working with an investment firm that the fans are not going to like.

It has emerged that Mr Murray has approached the parent company of Ticketus for funding that would enable the football club to stay out of administration. This has left many fans rather bewildered and they are unsure about why Mr Murray has made this decision. He has recently made the argument about why Octopus, the parent company, should be involved with the club and help it to stay in business.

It is expected that Mr Murray is going to meet with executives from Ticketus in the near future to discuss a rescue package for the club. The deal is also expected to involve the removal of Mr Whyte from ownership of the club.

The investment company is going to help the club deal with a significant amount of debt, which totals nearly £25 million. They are also going to provide some funding in order to keep the club running during the next few months. Once a financial recovery has occurred, there are going to be shares issued in the club which will allow the investment fund to get a return on their money.

It is going to be very hard for the fans to understand how their club is going to be saved by the very company that brought them to near financial ruin in the first place. There are sure to be significant trust issues about this company and the deal by Mr Murray is being doubted by many.

Mr Murray commented, “It is important that people remember that it is Mr Whyte who was responsible for many of the club’s financial problems, not Ticketus. They have offered us an agreement in good faith and I want fans to remember that they have helped us in the past.

They helped us get out of the debt we had to Lloyds bank and they also have significant experience in the industry. My primary concern is bringing the club out of its administration proceedings and I will take whatever steps necessary to make this happen.”

If the deal does go ahead, the football club is going to have a significant debt to repay. The club has struggled with debt payments in the past and last year they failed to repay around £10 million to a lender.

Mr Murray continued, “The club does not need to be involved in any sort of legal complication right now. We need to move forward with this financial planning, so that the best interests of the football club can be preserved. We are currently looking at our projections of future cash flow and we are ironing out the main details of the deal.

“I have come forward about how I am getting this funding because I believe secrecy has got the club into trouble in the past. Mr Whyte taught us that secrecy is suspicious and I don’t want to run the club in this way. If I find a better option, I’ll take it, but this is the only choice we have right now.”

Just another incident in the crazy life of Mario Balotelli.

by

Just another incident in the crazy life of Mario Balotelli. It is just another incident in the crazy life of Mario Balotelli. At least this time it is occurring on the football pitch rather than off it. Harry Redknapp had demanded that the FA take action against Balotelli for kicking Scott Parker in the head while he lay on the floor.

It was Balotelli who scored the fifth and final goal in Manchester City’s victory over Tottenham, but in Redknapp’s view he should not have been on the pitch. In the 84th minute Parker put his body in the way of Balotelli’s shot, landing on the floor in the process. In regaining his balance, Mario Balotelli clattered Parker’s head with his boots. The question is whether or not it was done deliberately.

Having been sent off earlier in the season, against Liverpool at Anfield, if the FA do decide to penalise the player, it will be a four match ban that rules him out of games until the end of February. Redknapp does not question the penalty decision, but maintains that the player should not have been available to put it into the net. Scott Parker had to get stitches in his head for the gash above his eye.

In another incident, Joleon Lescott could also have seen red when he appeared to hit Younes Kaboul with his forearm when challenging for the ball. If Howard Webb saw the Balotelli incident, then Redknapp suggests he shouldn’t be in charge of any football match, never mind a World Cup final, as it is clearly a red card offence. He does concede the possibility that Webb did not see the incident.

Team coach for Manchester City, David Platt, said that he hadn’t seen the incident, and wouldn’t comment until he had seen it. However, he did mention that last month it was shown that different angles revealed different ‘facts’. Balotelli had nothing to say on the matter. Drawn to talk on his penalty he said that he was calm, just like every other time he took a penalty.

Some see the man as a ‘lovable eccentric’ thanks to his many public antics such as: throwing darts at a work experience student, letting off fireworks in his bathroom, attempting to score with a back heel during a friendly pre-season game, using school bathrooms in Manchester and driving into a women’s prison in Italy ‘to look around’.

Redknapp clearly does not agree with this assessment. He couldn’t see any reason for Balotelli’s actions, and can’t see how it could possibly be an accident. He believes that Balotelli was reacting to Parker’s challenge, but that there had been nothing wrong with what Parker did.

Redknapp was not alone in his views. Graham Souness echoed the sentiment on Sky Sports, saying the Balotelli knew exactly what he did, and that rather than bringing his right leg forward he pushed backwards in order to hurt Parker.

About his own side, Harry Redknapp was effusive, congratulating his team on their efforts. Had Jermain Defore been able to stretch an inch further to make contact with the ball from Gareth Bale in the dying moments, then it could have been Tottenham that walked away with the points, and the title would have been very open. Instead City have stretched their lead to 8 points over the London club.